Reabilitação estética com facetas e coroas cerâmicas em dissilicato de lítio: relato de caso / Aesthetic rehabilitation with ceramic facets and crowns in lithium disilicate: case report

Introdução: A procura pela estética do sorriso é crescente na Odontologia, pois, muitas vezes um sorriso alinhado e periodonto saudável não são o bastante. A cerâmica odontológica apresenta-se como uma ótima possibilidade restauradora, visto o avanço das técnicas de adesão entre o substrato dentário e as cerâmicas, torna-se mais previsível o resultado com este tipo de reabilitação. Objetivo: O presente artigo tem como objetivo descrever um caso clínico com envolvimento de diversos níveis de desgaste dentário para reabilitação estética com cerâmica de dissilicato de lítio. Relato de caso: Paciente 36 anos, gênero feminino, apresentava insatisfação com seu sorriso devido a forma e a alteração de cor dos seus dentes superiores anteriores e pré-molares. O plano de tratamento consistiu em realizar a troca da coroa metalocerâmica por coroa total cerâmica da unidade 14, coroa total cerâmica nas unidades 11, 21 e 22, facetas cerâmicas nas unidades 15, 13, 12, 23, 24 e 25, osteotomia e gengivoplastia das regiões de 2º prémolar superior esquerdo ao 2º pré-molar superior direito, clareamento dental caseiro da arcada inferior e placa oclusal superior de proteção. O material de escolha para a resolução do caso clínico foi a cerâmica vítrea reforçada à base de dissilicato de lítio, pois, possui um índice de refração de luz semelhante à estrutura dentária, sem interferência significativa da translucidez, além de ser passível de cimentação adesiva por se tratar de uma cerâmica ácido sensível e o tamanho do cristal e a sua disposição favorecem o aumento das propriedades mecânicas da restauração. Conclusão: O plano de tratamento realizado permitiu o restabelecimento da função e estética, com reprodução das características dos dentes naturais e promoção da jovialidade e da harmonia no sorriso(AU)

Introduction:The demand for smile aesthetics is growing in Dentistry, because, often a smile aligned and healthy periodontium are not enough. Dental ceramics, presented as an excellent restorative possibility, since the advancement of adhesion techniques between the dental substrate and the ceramics, becomes more predictable the result with this type of rehabilitation. Objective: This article aims to describe a clinical case involving several levels of dental wear for aesthetic rehabilitation with ceramics. Case Report: A 36-year-old female patient presented dissatisfaction with her smile due to the shape and color alteration of her anterior and premolar upper teeth. The treatment plan consisted of exchanging the metal-ceramic crown for the total ceramic crown of unit 14, total ceramic crown in units 11, 21 and 22, ceramic veneers in units 15, 13, 12, 23, 24 and 25, osteotomy and gingivoplasty of the regions from 2nd left upper premolar to 2nd right upper premolar, home tooth whitening of the lower arch and upper occlusal plate of protection. The material of choice for the resolution of the clinical case was the glass ceramic reinforced on the basis of lithium disilicate because it has a refractive index of light similar to the dental structure, without significant interference of translucency, besides being liable to adhesive cementation because it is a sensitive acid ceramic and the size of the crystal and its disposition favor the increase of the mechanical properties of the restoration. Conclusion: The treatment plan performed allowed the restoration of function and aesthetics, with reproduction of the characteristics of natural teeth and promotion of joviality and harmony in the smile(AU)

Effect of different polishing methods on surface roughness of provisional prosthetic materials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surface roughness of bis-acrylic and acrylic resins submitted to different methods of polishing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty samples of each provisional restorative material (Structur 2, Protemp 4, Duralay, and Dencrilay) were fabricated (10 mm × 2 mm) and divided into five groups (n = 10): (1) positive control group - polyester strip; (2) negative control - unpolished; (3) abrasive tips (Exa-Technique-Edenta); (4) goat hair brush and diamond polishing paste; and (5) silicone tips (Enhance). Each material was mixed and polymerized according to manufacturer's instructions. The parameter evaluated was the arithmetic mean of the surface roughness (Ra) determined using the rugosimeter SJ 301 (Mitutoyo, Japan). The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (post hoc Tukey's test) (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The lowest surface roughness values (0,22-0,90 µm) were observed in the Group 4 - goat hair brush and diamond paste, while the highest values (1,17-1,44 µm) were found in the Group 5 - silicone tips (enhance), with statistically significant differences between them, except for Dencrilay acrylic resin. There was statistically significant difference between bis-acrylic and acrylic resins in the Groups 1, 2, and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the most effective polishing system was the goat hair brush with diamond paste for both bis-acrylic and acrylic resins. The bis-acrylic resins exhibited significantly smoother surfaces than the acrylic resins.